Progressive lense manufacturer - which are best?

There are several manufacturers of progressive lenses: Essilor (Varilux), Zeiss, Sola, Nikon and others. Which are the best within terms of ability and what are some of the differences between them that need to be taken into consideration?


Answers:    Wow, you really asked a tough one--there's not one answer even though you've hit on a topic sure to carry opticians defending the lenses we each prefer to dispense. Ask twenty opticians, bring back twenty answers. We all hold favorite lenses. I'm still put in my two cents, though.

Experienced opticians are more predictable to have a highly developed rate of satisfied patients though I reflect on many of us buy into the lens manufacturers' spin on these lenses to some extent because of shortage of side-by-side scientific comparison.
When I worked at a fasten store which dispensed the lower-cost, older-technology progressives as their default lenses, we have a certain percentage of patients who did not transform to these lenses. I now work next to opticians who dispense premium lenses as their default lenses. The number of patients beside problems adapting decrease sharply.

I also know that the opticians with whom I immediately work are more skilled at choosing the correct lens and getting the correct fitting than the people next to whom I used to work. This may be the biggest reason for the lower adaption rate.

There is, however, a existing difference in lens technology. I don't ponder I'd choose any manufacturer as individual the "best" for everyone. Many people next to low prescriptions do very very well with the elder technology of the Sola VIP or the Varilux Comfort. If you have much prescription, though, I'd plainly recommend going to a much newer-technology lens and nearly every manufacturer have them.

Varilux Comfort is still one of the best-selling lenses in the country, even though they hadn't changed the technology surrounded by many years. (They hold just just now changed to the Comfort 360, which is supposed to be better.) If I were to recommend a Varilux for most patients, I would recommend the Physio (not the Physio 360.) Buying a free-form lens approaching the 360 is more expensive than the regular Physio and is only more beneficial next to a very controlled number of patients (like highly astigmatic patients.) I be never a fan of the Comfort but hold had excellent nouns with the Physio and the Panamic.

Sola--I get the drift the SolaOne is pretty good--I rarely use a Sola lens, but I'd markedly use the SolaOne over the VIP or the XL. Why use the same antediluvian thing that's be around for many years if near is something better?

I also like Rodenstock's Life2, Zeiss's Gradal Top (I haven't used their newer GT2.)

If you hold an unusual Rx or a history of difficulty adapting, you probably want to consider a premium lens, even though they usually cost more.

*******

You probably have no idea you be gonna get this much info--the best item to do is to find an optician you trust and take the guidance you get. Ask profoundly of progressive lens wearers in your nouns about their glasses--ask if they approaching them and if they have problems beside them. Pick the place with the happiest patients!
Best of the best on the bazaar now is the Essilor Varilux Physio 360 and an very lens marketed at walmart underneath the Nikon Customized name, also made by Essilor, but much cheaper. Typically, the smaller number you spend on your lenses, the Narrower your reading area will be, surrounded by addition to more divergent distortion.
C'mon Seenotes...you of all ancestors should know that price has nought to do with getting a wider reading nouns.

The widest reading area of any progressive is the Sola VIP...it have been around for 25 years, and is still an excellent lens, but works best near small corrections for the distance. It is good for those who wear progressives chiefly for reading.

Every lens manufacturer will agree that the VIP is the widest reading...but we also know, the wider the reading nouns, the more distortion at the outer edges for distance. So it isn't good for adjectives Rx's. The VIP is a mid range as far as price go.

Paying more won't give wider reading...that isn't true at adjectives.

There are many brands, but not a bit one lens is best for everybody.

I use the Percepta by Sola for higher Rx's, along beside the Rodenstock Life2.depending on the maximum height I can procure in the frame. Their 1.6 lenses work without fault everytime.

For those who require a wider intermediate corridor, the "Sola One" does an excellent job.but not as appropriate for those who do more close work...so all lenses own their advantages and disadvantages.

The newest technology are the Free Form lenses...custom made...but they only enjoy an advantage within Rx's over +/- 4.00

The curvatures are corrected at 1000 points by computer rather than using the manufacturer preset base curve.so distance fantasy is 99% distortion free at the edges...but only works within higher Rx's...they are also certain as High Definition.

I have be fitting progressives for 38 years...and I can assure you...there isn't one brand that outshines adjectives others.

Most of the time for the last few years, because of small frames, the brand is chosen because of the seg rank available.

I fit an average of 40 progressives a month, and had single 5 in adjectives of 2007 that had to be redo because the patient wasn't delighted with the acting out of the lens.

Fancy brand names and high prices do not mean a better lens within most cases. Just more hype.

If your optician has lots of experience near them , he will know what is best for you.

There isn't any one lens brand that does it best.

Precise measurements , taking into consideration how the frame fits because of a higher or lower bridge...how close the frame can be fit within front of the eyes...deep set eyes.ect...are adjectives very influential in the nouns rate.

Those who go " by the book" for measure the heights of the seg , regularly have problems.

I would scheme to say 90% of the problems individuals have beside them are because of bad measurements...not the brand.

There are frequent brands the patients have never hear of, because they aren't associated with cameras resembling Nikon and Zeiss...but function just as all right...for a lot smaller number.
zeiss are considered the best at lens manufacturing and once you own worn a zeiss varifocal you should stick with them.Zeiss enjoy a unique disign call horizontal symmetry to reduce distortion. But they are expensive. Essilor varilux comfort are also obedient but the design of the comfort has not really be updated in olden times 10years.

With all varifocals you procure pheriphal distortion, but some designs have smaller number, varilux panamic is one

Speak to your optician and get their suggestion.

Specsavers do many different types, own branded and branded


More Questions and Answers ...